Article 106
in forceLegal remedies · Bijzondere rechtsmiddelen
If the court orders the lifting of a measure aimed at deprivation or restriction of liberty, or if the deprivation or restriction of liberty is already lifted prior to the hearing of the petition for the lifting of that measure, it may grant the alien compensation at the expense of the State. Damage shall include disadvantage that does not consist of pecuniary loss. Articles 534 and 536 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis. If the alien has died after the filing of his petition, the award shall be made for the benefit of his heirs.
The first paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis if the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State orders the lifting of the measure resulting in deprivation or restriction of liberty.
Indien de rechtbank de opheffing van een maatregel strekkende tot vrijheidsontneming of -beperking beveelt, dan wel de vrijheidsontneming of -beperking reeds voor de behandeling van het verzoek om opheffing van die maatregel wordt opgeheven, kan zij aan de vreemdeling een vergoeding ten laste van de Staat toekennen. Onder schade is begrepen het nadeel dat niet in vermogensschade bestaat. De artikelen 534 en 536 van het Wetboek van Strafvordering zijn van overeenkomstige toepassing. Indien de vreemdeling na het indienen van zijn verzoek is overleden, geschiedt de toekenning ten behoeve van zijn erfgenamen.
Het eerste lid is van overeenkomstige toepassing, indien de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State de opheffing van de maatregel strekkende tot vrijheidsontneming of -beperking beveelt.
Decisions of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (ABRvS) — the highest court in immigration cases — applying this article. Annotations are unofficial translations.
By decision of 3 November 2025, the Minister of Asylum and Migration has placed the appellant in administrative detention.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 19 November 2025, the Minister of Asylum and Migration has placed the appellant in administrative detention.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 27 March 2026, the Minister of Asylum and Migration imposed a measure involving deprivation of liberty upon the appellant.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 22 November 2025, the Minister of Asylum and Migration imposed a measure involving deprivation of liberty upon the appellant.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 2 February 2026, the Minister of Asylum and Migration has placed the appellant in administrative detention.
Decision on rechtspraak.nl