Article 1:209
in forceParentage · Claiming or contesting civil status of parentage
A person's descent according to his birth certificate cannot be contested by another person if he has a status in accordance with that certificate.
Iemands afstamming volgens zijn geboorteakte kan door een ander niet worden betwist, indien hij een staat overeenkomstig die akte heeft.
Decisions of the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) applying this article. Annotations are unofficial translations.
Caribbean case. Law of persons and family law. Nationality law; Art. 17 RWN, determination of Dutch nationality. Ratification of void acknowledgment of children, Art. 3:58 paragraph 1 and 3:59 BWC; best interests of the child. HR 28 November 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:3460. Purport of ‘possession of status’ (bezit van staat) Art. 1:209 BWC, also protection against foreign defective certificates (HR 9 March 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BU9884, NJ 2012/291). Acknowledgment by a married man, public policy, Art. 1:204 paragraph 1 under e BWC. Acquisition of Dutch nationality.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlCaribbean case. Law of persons and family law. Nationality law; Art. 17 RWN, determination of Dutch citizenship. Ratification of void acknowledgment of children, Art. 3:58 paragraph 1 and 3:59 BWC; best interests of the child. HR 28 November 2014, ECLI:NL:HR:2014:3460. Purport of ‘possession of status’ (bezit van staat) Art. 1:209 BWC, also protection against foreign defective certificates (HR 9 March 2012, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BU9884, NJ 2012/291). Acknowledgment by a married man, public policy, Art. 1:204 paragraph 1 under e BWC.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlArt. 81 paragraph 1 RO. Family law. Contestation and claim of status; art. 1:209-211 BW.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlFamily law. Contestation of descent; status (not) in accordance with the birth certificate (Article 1:209 of the Civil Code); rejection of the petition for a declaration of merit regarding the contestation of descent in violation of Article 8 ECHR?
Decision on rechtspraak.nl7 November 2003 First Chamber No. R02/094HR JMH/AT Supreme Court of the Netherlands Judgment in the case of: 1. [petitioner 1], 2. [petitioner 2], 3. [petitioner 3], 4. [petitioner 4], and 5. [petitioner 5], all residing in Aruba, PETITIONERS in cassation, advocate: mr. A.K. Oostlander-Vos, a g a i n s t [respondent], residing in Aruba, RESPONDENT in cassation, advocate: mr. J.A. Meijer. 1. The proceedings in the lower courts...
Decision on rechtspraak.nl