Article 83b
in forceLegal remedies · Asiel
The court shall render its decision within four weeks after the filing of the appeal, if:
the application for the granting of a residence permit for asylum as referred to in Article 28:
has not been considered on the basis of Article 30;
has been declared inadmissible on the basis of Article 30a;
has been rejected as manifestly unfounded on the basis of Article 30b;
has been stayed on the basis of Article 30c; or
the appeal is directed against a transfer decision as referred to in Article 62b.
By way of derogation from the first paragraph, the court shall render its decision within twelve weeks, or sixteen weeks if Article 67, eleventh paragraph of the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation is applicable, calculated from the date of registration of the application for the granting of an asylum residence permit as referred to in Article 28, if the application has been processed in the asylum border procedure. This period cannot be extended.
By way of derogation from the first paragraph, the court shall render its decision within twenty-three weeks after the appeal has been lodged, if:
the application for the granting of a residence permit for asylum as referred to in Article 28 has been granted on the basis of Article 29a;
the application for the grant of a residence permit for asylum as referred to in Article 28 has been rejected as unfounded on the basis of Article 31; or
the residence permit for asylum as referred to in Article 28 has been withdrawn on the basis of Article 32.
In the cases referred to in the first and third paragraphs, Article 8:52, second and third paragraphs, of the General Administrative Law Act (Algemene wet bestuursrecht) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
De rechtbank doet binnen vier weken na het instellen van het beroep uitspraak, indien:
de aanvraag tot het verlenen van een verblijfsvergunning asiel als bedoeld in artikel 28:
niet in behandeling is genomen op grond van artikel 30;
niet-ontvankelijk is verklaard op grond van artikel 30a;
is afgewezen als kennelijk ongegrond op grond van artikel 30b;
buiten behandeling is gesteld op grond van artikel 30c; of
het beroep zich richt tegen een overdrachtsbesluit als bedoeld in artikel 62b.
In afwijking van het eerste lid, doet de rechtbank uitspraak binnen twaalf weken, dan wel zestien weken indien artikel 67, elfde lid van de Asiel- en migratiebeheerverordening van toepassing is, gerekend vanaf de datum van registratie van de aanvraag tot het verlenen van een verblijfsvergunning asiel als bedoeld in artikel 28, indien de aanvraag is behandeld in de asielgrensprocedure. Deze termijn kan niet worden verlengd.
In afwijking van het eerste lid, doet de rechtbank uitspraak binnen drieëntwintig weken na het instellen van het beroep, indien:
de aanvraag tot het verlenen van een verblijfsvergunning asiel als bedoeld in artikel 28 is ingewilligd op grond van artikel 29a;
de aanvraag tot het verlenen van een verblijfsvergunning asiel als bedoeld in artikel 28 is afgewezen als ongegrond op grond van artikel 31; of
de verblijfsvergunning asiel als bedoeld in artikel 28 is ingetrokken op grond van artikel 32.
In de gevallen, bedoeld in het eerste en derde lid, is artikel 8:52, tweede en derde lid, van de Algemene wet bestuursrecht van overeenkomstige toepassing.
Decisions of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (ABRvS) — the highest court in immigration cases — applying this article. Annotations are unofficial translations.
By oral judgment of 13 May 2025, the court declared the appeal lodged by the person concerned against it well-founded, ordered the lifting of the measure of deprivation of liberty with effect from that day, and denied the petition for compensation.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 18 April 2025, the Minister imposed a measure involving deprivation of liberty upon the person concerned. By oral judgment of 13 May 2025, the court declared the appeal lodged by the person concerned against said measure well-founded, ordered the lifting of the measure involving deprivation of liberty with effect from that day, and denied the petition for compensation. The Minister has lodged an appeal against this judgment. The person concerned, represented by Mr. A. Jankie, advocate in The Hague, has submitted a written statement.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 16 November 2024, the Minister of Asylum and Migration has imposed a measure involving deprivation of liberty upon the person concerned.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decisions of 13 July 2024, the Minister of Asylum and Migration has imposed measures involving deprivation of liberty upon the foreign nationals.
Decision on rechtspraak.nlBy decision of 16 March 2024, the State Secretary for Justice and Security has imposed a measure involving deprivation of liberty upon the foreign national.
Decision on rechtspraak.nl